minimum of constrained nonlinear multivariable function algorithm Search Results


mahalanobis distance  (CH Instruments)
90
CH Instruments mahalanobis distance
Mahalanobis Distance, supplied by CH Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mahalanobis distance/product/CH Instruments
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mahalanobis distance - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
multivariate multiple imputation  (STATA Corporation)
99
STATA Corporation multivariate multiple imputation
Mean differences in offspring bone-mineral content in relation to maternal 25(OH)D concentrations in pregnancy, by trimester (A) Offspring total body bone-mineral content (total body less head measured; n=3960). (B) Offspring spine bone-mineral content (n=3196). The p values test whether the association between maternal 25(OH)D concentration and offspring BMC differs by trimester of measurement. Model A adjusted for maternal age and offspring age and sex. Model B, the main confounder-adjusted model, was model A plus adjustment for maternal education, ethnic origin, parity, smoking in pregnancy, and body-mass index before pregnancy. Model C was model B plus adjustment for potential mediation by birthweight, gestational age, and offspring height, lean mass, and fat mass. Model D was model B plus adjustment for potential mediation by offspring 25(OH)D concentrations. Values missing for covariables were calculated by <t>multivariate</t> multiple imputation. 25(OH)D=25-hydroxyvitamin D. Predicted 3rd=all women with 25(OH)D concentrations adjusted to 34 weeks' gestation.
Multivariate Multiple Imputation, supplied by STATA Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/multivariate multiple imputation/product/STATA Corporation
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
multivariate multiple imputation - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
metaboanalyst 6.0.38  (GraphPad Software Inc)
90
GraphPad Software Inc metaboanalyst 6.0.38
Mean differences in offspring bone-mineral content in relation to maternal 25(OH)D concentrations in pregnancy, by trimester (A) Offspring total body bone-mineral content (total body less head measured; n=3960). (B) Offspring spine bone-mineral content (n=3196). The p values test whether the association between maternal 25(OH)D concentration and offspring BMC differs by trimester of measurement. Model A adjusted for maternal age and offspring age and sex. Model B, the main confounder-adjusted model, was model A plus adjustment for maternal education, ethnic origin, parity, smoking in pregnancy, and body-mass index before pregnancy. Model C was model B plus adjustment for potential mediation by birthweight, gestational age, and offspring height, lean mass, and fat mass. Model D was model B plus adjustment for potential mediation by offspring 25(OH)D concentrations. Values missing for covariables were calculated by <t>multivariate</t> multiple imputation. 25(OH)D=25-hydroxyvitamin D. Predicted 3rd=all women with 25(OH)D concentrations adjusted to 34 weeks' gestation.
Metaboanalyst 6.0.38, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/metaboanalyst 6.0.38/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
metaboanalyst 6.0.38 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
metaboanalyst 5.0.30  (GraphPad Software Inc)
90
GraphPad Software Inc metaboanalyst 5.0.30
Mean differences in offspring bone-mineral content in relation to maternal 25(OH)D concentrations in pregnancy, by trimester (A) Offspring total body bone-mineral content (total body less head measured; n=3960). (B) Offspring spine bone-mineral content (n=3196). The p values test whether the association between maternal 25(OH)D concentration and offspring BMC differs by trimester of measurement. Model A adjusted for maternal age and offspring age and sex. Model B, the main confounder-adjusted model, was model A plus adjustment for maternal education, ethnic origin, parity, smoking in pregnancy, and body-mass index before pregnancy. Model C was model B plus adjustment for potential mediation by birthweight, gestational age, and offspring height, lean mass, and fat mass. Model D was model B plus adjustment for potential mediation by offspring 25(OH)D concentrations. Values missing for covariables were calculated by <t>multivariate</t> multiple imputation. 25(OH)D=25-hydroxyvitamin D. Predicted 3rd=all women with 25(OH)D concentrations adjusted to 34 weeks' gestation.
Metaboanalyst 5.0.30, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/metaboanalyst 5.0.30/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
metaboanalyst 5.0.30 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
minimum bayesian information criterion  (SAS institute)
90
SAS institute minimum bayesian information criterion
Mean differences in offspring bone-mineral content in relation to maternal 25(OH)D concentrations in pregnancy, by trimester (A) Offspring total body bone-mineral content (total body less head measured; n=3960). (B) Offspring spine bone-mineral content (n=3196). The p values test whether the association between maternal 25(OH)D concentration and offspring BMC differs by trimester of measurement. Model A adjusted for maternal age and offspring age and sex. Model B, the main confounder-adjusted model, was model A plus adjustment for maternal education, ethnic origin, parity, smoking in pregnancy, and body-mass index before pregnancy. Model C was model B plus adjustment for potential mediation by birthweight, gestational age, and offspring height, lean mass, and fat mass. Model D was model B plus adjustment for potential mediation by offspring 25(OH)D concentrations. Values missing for covariables were calculated by <t>multivariate</t> multiple imputation. 25(OH)D=25-hydroxyvitamin D. Predicted 3rd=all women with 25(OH)D concentrations adjusted to 34 weeks' gestation.
Minimum Bayesian Information Criterion, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/minimum bayesian information criterion/product/SAS institute
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
minimum bayesian information criterion - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Mean differences in offspring bone-mineral content in relation to maternal 25(OH)D concentrations in pregnancy, by trimester (A) Offspring total body bone-mineral content (total body less head measured; n=3960). (B) Offspring spine bone-mineral content (n=3196). The p values test whether the association between maternal 25(OH)D concentration and offspring BMC differs by trimester of measurement. Model A adjusted for maternal age and offspring age and sex. Model B, the main confounder-adjusted model, was model A plus adjustment for maternal education, ethnic origin, parity, smoking in pregnancy, and body-mass index before pregnancy. Model C was model B plus adjustment for potential mediation by birthweight, gestational age, and offspring height, lean mass, and fat mass. Model D was model B plus adjustment for potential mediation by offspring 25(OH)D concentrations. Values missing for covariables were calculated by multivariate multiple imputation. 25(OH)D=25-hydroxyvitamin D. Predicted 3rd=all women with 25(OH)D concentrations adjusted to 34 weeks' gestation.

Journal: Lancet

Article Title: Association of maternal vitamin D status during pregnancy with bone-mineral content in offspring: a prospective cohort study

doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62203-X

Figure Lengend Snippet: Mean differences in offspring bone-mineral content in relation to maternal 25(OH)D concentrations in pregnancy, by trimester (A) Offspring total body bone-mineral content (total body less head measured; n=3960). (B) Offspring spine bone-mineral content (n=3196). The p values test whether the association between maternal 25(OH)D concentration and offspring BMC differs by trimester of measurement. Model A adjusted for maternal age and offspring age and sex. Model B, the main confounder-adjusted model, was model A plus adjustment for maternal education, ethnic origin, parity, smoking in pregnancy, and body-mass index before pregnancy. Model C was model B plus adjustment for potential mediation by birthweight, gestational age, and offspring height, lean mass, and fat mass. Model D was model B plus adjustment for potential mediation by offspring 25(OH)D concentrations. Values missing for covariables were calculated by multivariate multiple imputation. 25(OH)D=25-hydroxyvitamin D. Predicted 3rd=all women with 25(OH)D concentrations adjusted to 34 weeks' gestation.

Article Snippet: To increase efficiency and keep selection bias to a minimum, we used multivariate multiple imputation (Stata, version 11 MP2) to impute missing values of covariables for eligible participants, according to the method described by Royston.

Techniques: Concentration Assay

Mean differences in offspring bone-mineral content in relation to maternal 25(OH)D concentrations in pregnancy, by trimester and sex of offspring (A) Offspring total body bone-mineral content (total body less head measured; n=3960). (B) Offspring spine bone-mineral content (n=3196). Model A adjusted for maternal age and offspring age and sex. Model B, the main confounder-adjusted model was model A plus adjustment for maternal education, ethnic origin, parity, smoking in pregnancy, and body-mass index before pregnancy. Model C was model B plus adjustment for potential mediation by birthweight, gestational age, and offspring height, lean mass, and fat mass. Model D was model B plus adjustment for potential mediation by offspring 25(OH)D. Values missing for covariables were calculated by multivariate multiple imputation. 25(OH)D=25-hydroxyvitamin D. Predicted 3rd=all women with 25(OH)D concentrations adjusted to 34 weeks' gestation.

Journal: Lancet

Article Title: Association of maternal vitamin D status during pregnancy with bone-mineral content in offspring: a prospective cohort study

doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62203-X

Figure Lengend Snippet: Mean differences in offspring bone-mineral content in relation to maternal 25(OH)D concentrations in pregnancy, by trimester and sex of offspring (A) Offspring total body bone-mineral content (total body less head measured; n=3960). (B) Offspring spine bone-mineral content (n=3196). Model A adjusted for maternal age and offspring age and sex. Model B, the main confounder-adjusted model was model A plus adjustment for maternal education, ethnic origin, parity, smoking in pregnancy, and body-mass index before pregnancy. Model C was model B plus adjustment for potential mediation by birthweight, gestational age, and offspring height, lean mass, and fat mass. Model D was model B plus adjustment for potential mediation by offspring 25(OH)D. Values missing for covariables were calculated by multivariate multiple imputation. 25(OH)D=25-hydroxyvitamin D. Predicted 3rd=all women with 25(OH)D concentrations adjusted to 34 weeks' gestation.

Article Snippet: To increase efficiency and keep selection bias to a minimum, we used multivariate multiple imputation (Stata, version 11 MP2) to impute missing values of covariables for eligible participants, according to the method described by Royston.

Techniques: